White,A.F., Schulz,M.S., Vivit,D.V., Blum,A.E., Stonestrom,D.A. and Anderson,S.P.(2008): Chemical weathering of a marine terrace chronosequence, Santa Cruz, California I: Interpreting rates and controls based on soil concentration - depth profiles. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72, 36-68.

『カリフォルニア州サンタクルーズの海成段丘クロノシーケンス(時間以外の要因は同じと看做される地層)の化学風化T:土壌濃度−深度断面に基づいた速度とコントロールの解釈』


Abstract
 The spatial and temporal changes in element and mineral concentrations in regolith profiles in a chronosequence developed on marine terraces along coastal California are interpreted in terms of chemical weathering rates and processes. In regoliths up to 15 m deep and 226 kyrs old, quartz-normalized mass transfer coefficients indicate non-stoichiometric preferential release of Sr>Ca>Na from plagioclase along with lesser amounts of K, Rb and Ba derived from K-feldspar. Smectite weathering results in the loss of Mg and concurrent incorporation of Al and Fe into secondary kaolinite and Fe-oxides in shallow argillic horizons. Elemental losses from weathering of the Santa Cruz terraces fall within the range of those for other marine terraces along the Pacific Coast of North America.
 Residual amounts of plagioclase and K-feldspar decrease with terrace depth and increasing age. The gradient of the weathering profile bs id defined by the ratio of the weathering rate, R to the velocity at which the profile penetrates into the protolith. A spreadsheet calculator further refines profile geometries, demonstrating that the non-linear regions at low residual feldspar concentrations at shallow depth are dominated by exponential changes in mineral surface-to-volume ratios and at high residual feldspar concentrations, at greater depth, by the approach to thermodynamic saturation. These parameters are of secondary importance to the fluid flux qh, which in thermodynamically saturated pore water, controls the weathering velocity and mineral losses from the profiles. Long-term fluid fluxes required to reproduce the feldspar weathering profiles are in agreement with contemporary values based on solute Cl balances (qh = 0.025-0.17 m yr-1).
 During saturation-controlled and solute-limited weathering, the greater loss of plagioclase relative to K-feldspar is dependent on the large difference in their respective solubilities instead of the small difference between their respective reaction kinetics. The steady-state weathering rate under such conditions is defined as
 R = [qh・(msol/Mtotal)]・[1/(Sv・bs)]・
 The product of qh and the ratio of solubilized to solid state feldspar (msat/Mtotal) define the weathering velocity. The weathering gradient bs reflects the kinetic rate of reaction where Sv is the volumetric surface area of the residual feldspar. Both this rate expression and the spreadsheet calculations produce similar plagioclase weathering rates (R = 5-14×10-16 mol m-2 s-1) which agree with those reported for other environments of comparable climate and age. Weathering-dependent concentration profiles are commonly described in literature. The present paper provides methods by which these data can yield a more fundamental understanding of the weathering processes involved.』

1. Introduction
2. Site characterization
 2.1. Geology
 2.2. Terrace ages
 2.3. Sampling and analyses
3. Results
 3.1 Elemental distributions
 3.2. Primary mineral distributions
 3.3. Clay and Fe oxide distributions
4. Discussion
 4.1. Elemental mobilities
  4.1.1. Protolith compositions
  4.1.2. Mobility of Na, Ca, Sr
  4.1.3. Mobility of K, Rb and Ba
  4.1.4. Effect of eolian deposition on weathering profiles
  4.1.5. Mobility of Mg, Al, and Fe
  4.1.6. Mass changes
  4.1.7. Mass fluxes
 4.2. Mineral weathering rates
  4.2.1. A weathering profile calculator
 4.3. Controls on mineral weathering
  4.3.1. Role of fluid flow
  4.3.2. Role of the reaction rate constant
  4.3.3. Role of surface area
  4.3.4. The role of differing feldspar solubilities
  4.3.5. Role of thermodynamic saturation
 4.4. Comparing terrace weathering profiles
  4.4.1. Steady-state versus non-steady weathering profiles
  4.4.2. Simple methods for estimating weathering velocities and rates
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Appendix I
Appendix II
References


戻る