Maher et al.(2006)による〔『U-Sr isotopic speedometer: Fluid flow and chemical weathering rates in aquifers』(4417p)から〕

『U-Sr同位体速度計:帯水層中の流水量と化学風化速度』


Abstract
 Both chemical weathering rates and fluid flow are difficult to measure in natural systems. However, these parameters are critical for understanding the hydrochemical evolution of aquifers, predicting the fate and transport of contaminants, and for water resources/water quality considerations. 87Sr/86Sr and (234U/238U) activity ratios are sensitive indicators of water-rock interaction, and thus provide a means of quantifying both flow and reactivity. The 87Sr/86Sr values in ground waters are controlled by the ratio of the dissolution rate to the flow rate. Similarly, the (234U/238U) ratio of natural ground waters is a balance between the flow rate and the dissolution of solids, and α-recoil loss of 234U from the solids. By coupling these two isotope systems it is possible to constrain both the long-term (ca. 100's to 1000's of years) flow rate and bulk dissolution rate along the flow path. Previous estimates of the ratio of the dissolution rate to the infiltration flux from Sr isotopes (87Sr/86Sr) are combined with a model for (234U/238U) to constrain the infiltration flux and dissolution rate for a 70-m deep vadose zone core from Hanford, Washington. The coupled model for both (234U/238U) ratios and the 87Sr/86Sr data suggests an infiltration flux of 5±2 mm/yr, and bulk silicate dissolution rates between 10-15.7 and 10-16.5 mol/m2/s. The process of α-recoil enrichment, while primarily responsible for the observed variation in (234U/238U) of natural systems, is difficult to quantify. However, the rate of this process in natural systems affects the interpretation of most U-series data. Models for quantifying the α-recoil loss fraction based on geometric predictions, surface area constraints, and chemical methods are also presented. The agreement between the chemical and theoretical methods, such as direct measurement of (234U/238U) of the small grain size fraction and geometric calculations for that size fraction, is quite good.

1. Introduction
2. Site description
3. Analytical procedures
 3.1. Surface area measurements
 3.2. Sequential leaches
 3.3. Grain size fractions/mineralogy
 3.4. Isotopic analyses
4. Results
 4.1. (234U/238U) in pore waters and leaches
 4.2. (234U/238U) in bulk sediment and grain size fractions
5. Discussion
 5.1. Interpretive model of U isotopes in pore fluid
 5.2. The α-recoil length of 234Th in natural minerals
 5.3. Approaches to estimating the α-recoil loss fraction
  5.3.1. Geometric considerations
  5.3.2. Geometric estimates of the α-recoil loss fraction in natural sediment
  5.3.3. Measured depletion in fine-grained sediments
  5.3.4. Measured depletion in mineral surfaces
  5.3.5. Surface depletion and non-steady state α-recoil loss
  5.3.6. Preferential leaching
 5.4. Summary of α-recoil loss rate estimates for Hanford sediments
 5.5. Estimates of the infiltration and weathering rate for Hanford sediments
  5.5.1. Previous estimates of infiltration and dissolution from pore water 87Sr/86Sr
  5.5.2. Coupled U-Sr model for dissolution/infiltration
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References


戻る