Van der Weijden & Pacheco(2006)による〔『Hydrogeochemistry in the Vouga River basin (central Portugal): Pollution and chemical weathering』(580pから)〕

『ボウガ川流域(ポルトガル中央部)における水文地球化学:汚染と化学風化』


Abstract
 To quantify and explain the contributions by pollution and chemical weathering to their compositions, we studied the chemistries of springs and surface waters in the mountainous part of the Vouga River basin. Water samples were collected during a number of consecutive summer campaigns. Recharge rates were derived from monitored discharge rates within the basin. Very large contributions by meteoric, agricultural and domestic sources to the water chemistries were found, identified by the chloride, sulfate and nitrate concentrations: on average only 1/4 to 1/3 of the solutes could be attributed to chemical weathering. Two petrologic units characterize the river basins: granites and metasediments. The waters collected within metasediment units are distinct from those in granite terrain by a higher magnesium concentration. On that basis, it could be estimated that the Rio Vouga, when leaving the mountainous part of the basin, has for some 2*5 a signature determined by chemical weathering in the metasediments. The dominant primary minerals subject to chemical weathering are plagioclase (Pl) and biotite (in granite) or Pl and chlorite (in metasediment). Kaolinite, gibbsite and vermiculite are the major weathering products where annual precipitation (P)>1000 mm y-1, and kaolinite, vermiculite and smectite where P was lower. Using an algorithm based on the ratio of dissolved silica to bicarbonate, the contributions of chemical weathering of primary minerals could be unraveled. The results show that in granite the export rate (as mol ha-1 y-1 wt% mineral-1) of oligoclase (Pl with An10-30) was 5.0±2.6 and of biotite 3.2±2.6, while in metasediment these rates for albite (Pl with An0-10) are 16.5±8.9 and for chlorite are 0.5±0.5. The observed decrease of dissolved silica in surface waters relative to springs was ascribed to (summer) uptake by aquatic biota.』

1. Introduction
2. Regional setting
 2.1. Geology, petrology, mineralogy
 2.2. Morphology and climate
 2.3. Hydrology
 2.4. Soils and land use
3. Materials and methods
4. Results and discussion
 4.1. Total concentrations
 4.2. Atmospheric and anthropogenic contributions
 4.3. Natural contributions
 4.4. Vouga water
5. mineral weathering
 5.1. Modeling assumptions
 5.2. Results of the SiB algorithm - springs
 5.3. Results of the SiB algorithm - stream(let)s
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Appendix 1. Brief outline of the Kille method
Appendix 2. Vouga data set
Appendix 3. Brief outline on the SiB algorithm
References


戻る