Kerisit,S., Liu,C. and Ilton,E.S.(2008): Molecular dynamics simulations of the orthoclase (001)- and (010)-water interfaces. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72, 1481-1497.

『正長石の(001)および(010)面と水の界面の分子動力学シミュレーション』


Abstract
 Molecular dynamics simulations of water in contact with the (001) and (010) surfaces of orthoclase (KAlSi3O8) were carried out to investigate the structure and dynamics of the feldspar-water interface, contrast the intrinsic structural properties of the two surfaces, and provide a basis for future work on the diffusion of ions and molecules in microscopic mineral fractures. Electron density profiles were computed from the molecular dynamics trajectories and compared with those derived experimentally from high-resolution X-ray reflectivity measurements by Fenter and co-workers[Fenter P., Cheng L., Park C., Zhang H. and Sturchio,N. C. (2003a) Structure of the orthoclase (001)- and (010)-water interfaces by high-resolution X-ray reflectivity. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 4267-4275]. For each surface, three scenarios were considered whereby the interfacial species is potassium, water, or a hydronium ion. Excellent agreement was obtained for the (001) surface when potassium is the predominant interfacial species; however, some discrepancies in the position of the interfacial peaks were obtained for the (010) surface. The two surfaces showed similarities in the extent of water ordering at the interface, the activation energies for water and potassium desorption, and the adsorption localization of interfacial species. However, there are also important differences between the two surfaces in the coordination of a given adsorbed species, adsorption site densities, and the propensity for water molecules in surface cavities and those in the first hydration layer to coordinate to surface bridging oxygen atoms. These differences may have implications for the extent of dissolution in the low-pH regime since hydrolysis of Si(Al)-O-Si(Al) bonds is a major dissolution mechanism.』

1. Introduction
2. Computational methods
3. Results and discussion
 3.1. Orthoclase (001) surface
 3.2. Orthoclase (010) surface
 3.3. Potassium and water residence time in cavity sites
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Appendix A. Supplementary data
References



戻る