『Abstract
This paper develops a method for identifying and assessing long-term
supply risks for mineral raw materials. The method is based on
a combined evaluation of past and future supply and demand trends.
By analysing raw material boom and bust cycles over the past 50
years, we have quantified indicators and defined benchmarks for
identifying critical market situations. By applying the method,
risks for supply shortage may be identified at an early stage.
In addition, a numerical evaluation model has been developed for
better comparison between various mineral raw materials. Compared
to other assessment methods this method uses specific benchmarks
for each raw material to better assess supply risks. The method
is embedded within a systematic and comprehensive analytical approach.
Based on this model, companies can make better informed decisions
for their market assessment and may use suitable risk mitigation
instruments to counteract problematic developments.
Understanding future supply conditions is especially useful when
selecting new technologies for products which require an intensive
use of raw materials. As an example, the method is applied to
the copper market as of 2006.
It is important to emphasise that nobody can foresee the future
of raw material prices. But we may aim to better understand the
weaknesses of these markets which may lead to future supply shortages
thus influencing price.
Keywords: Automobile industry; Copper; Indicators; Market analysis;
Mining; Procurement; Raw material; Mineral Resources; Resource
management; Risk mitigation; Supply risk; Supply and demand; Security
of supply』
Introduction
Review of market instability and metal prices
Systematics of supply and demand analyses
Methodical basics
Relevance analysis and data
Developing the indicators and benchmarks
Forecasts
Analysis for copper
Data situation
Price trends
Supply and demand
Market balance (rating: 4, moderate; trend: problematic)
Stock-keeping (rating: 9, problematic)
Mine/refinery capacity utilisation (rating: 7, problematic;
trend: problematic)
Production costs
Cash costs (rating: 3, relaxed)
Geostrategic risks
Country concentration and country risks (rating: 4, relaxed;
trend: relaxed)
Market power/company concentration
Company concentration (rating: 2, relaxed)
Supply and demand trends/forecast
Static life time of reserves and resources (rating: 5, relaxed)
Degree of exploration (for 200-2004, rating: 6.5, moderate;
for 2004 rating: 2, relaxed, trend relaxed)
Investments (for 1998-2002, rating: 6, moderate)
Market balance in 5 years (rating: 7, problematic)
Overall rating
Discussion and conclusions
Acknowledgements
Appendix 1. Selection of basic data for assessing long-term
supply risks for mineral raw materials. The list is open to further
additions
References