『Abstract
Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are essential elements for all
living organisms. However, in excess, they contribute to such
environmental problems as aquatic and terrestrial eutrophication
(N, P), acidification (N), global warming (N), groundwater pollution
(N), depletion of stratospheric ozone (N), formulation of tropospheric
zone (N) and poor urban air quality (N). Globally, human action
has multiplied the volume of N and P cycling since the onset of
industrialization. The multiplication is a result of intensified
agriculture, increased energy consumption and population growth.
Industrial ecology (IE) is a discipline, in which human interaction
with the ecosystems is investigated using a system analytical
approach. The main idea behind IE is that industrial systems resemble
ecosystems, and, like them, industrial systems can then be described
using material, energy and information flows and stocks. Industrial
systems are dependent on the resources provided by the biosphere,
and these two cannot be separated from each other. When studying
substance flows, the aims of the research from the viewpoint of
IE can be, for instance, to elucidate the ways how the cycles
of a certain substance could be more closed and how the flows
of a certain substance could be decreased per unit of production
(= dematerialization). IE uses analytical research tools such
as material and substance flow analysis (MFA, SFA), energy flow
analysis (EFA), life cycle assessment (LCA) and material input
per service unit (MIPS).
In Finland, N and P are studied widely in different ecosystems
and environmental emissions. A holistic picture comparing different
societal systems is, however, lacking. In this thesis, flows of
N and P were examined in Finland using SFA in the following four
subsystems: I) forest industry and use of wood fuels, II) food
production and consumption, III) energy, and IV) municipal waste.
A detailed analysis at the end of the 1990s was performed. Furthermore,
historical development of the N and P flows was investigated in
the energy system (III) and the municipal waste system (IV). The
main research sources were official statistics, literature, monitoring
data, and expert knowledge.
The aim was to identify and quantify the main flows of N and
P in Finland in the four subsystems studied. Furthermore, the
aim was to elucidate whether the nutrient systems are cyclic or
linear, and to identify how these systems could be more efficient
in the use and cycling of N and P. A final aim was to discuss
how this type of an analysis can be used to support decision-making
on environmental problems and solutions.
Of the four subsystems, the food production and consumption system
and the energy system created the largest N flows in Finland.
For the creation of P flows, the food production and consumption
system (Paper II) was clearly the largest, followed by the forest
industry and use of wood fuels and the energy system. The contribution
of Finland to N and P flows on a global scale is low, but when
compared on a per capita basis, we are one of the largest producers
of these flows, with relatively high energy and meat consumption
being the main reasons.
Analysis revealed the openness of all four systems. The openness
is due to the high degree of internationality of the Finnish markets,
the large-scale use of synthetic fertilizers and energy resources
and the low recycling rate of many waste fractions. Reduction
in the use of fuels and synthetic fertilizers, reorganization
of the structure of energy production, reduced human intake of
nutrients and technological development are crucial in diminishing
the N and P flows. To enhance nutrient recycling and replace inorganic
fertilizers, recycling of such wastes as wood ash and sludge could
be promoted.
SFA is not usually sufficiently detailed to allow specific recommendations
for decision-making to be made, but it does yield useful information
about the relative magnitude of the flows and may reveal unexpected
losses. SFA studies should be supported with other methods such
as LCA. Data uncertainties are high in this type of analysis.
Use of quantitative uncertainty analysis is therefore recommended.
Definition of the system boundaries significantly affects conclusions
drawn from SFA results.
Sustainable development is a widely accepted target for all human
action. SFA is one method that can help to analyse how effective
different efforts are in leading to a more sustainable society.
SFA's strength is that it allows a holistic picture of different
natural and societal systems to be drawn. Furthermore, when the
environmental impact of a certain flow is known, the method can
be used to prioritize environmental policy efforts.』
Contents
List of abbreviations
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
1.2. Industrial ecology and industrial metabolism
1.2.1. Closing material material cycles
1.2.2. Diminishing of material flows
1.3. Topics under investigation
1.3.1. Nitrogen (N)
1.3.2. Phosphorus (P)
1.4. Study area - Finland
Agriculture
Forests and forest industry
Fertilizer production
Energy production and consumption
2. Aims of the study
3. Materials and methods
3.1. Substance flow analysis (SFA)
3.2. System description
I Forest industry and use of wood fuels
II Food production and consumption system
III Energy system
IV Municipal waste system
3.3. Data sources and quantification methods
3.3.1. Situation at the end of the 1990s
3.3.2. Historical data
4. Results
4.1. Situation at the end of the 1990s
4.1.1. Flows between production and consumption sectors
4.1.2. Flows to water, air and soil (environmental flows)
4.1.3. Recycling and re-use of N and P
4.2. Historical changes in N and P flows
4.2.1. Energy system
4.2.2. Waste and wastewater management system
5. Discussion
5.1. Magnitude of the Finnish N and P flows
5.2. Closing the N and P cycles
5.3. Possibilities for diminishing N and P flows
5.4. Importance of system boundaries
5.5. Uncertainties
5.6. SFA as a decision-making tool
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References
フロー |
|
フロー |
|
|||
1 | HII | 肥料(農業) | 180000 | HII | 肥料(農業) | 29500 |
2 | DII | 作物産出高 | 147000 | DII | 作物産出高 | 21900 |
3 | EII | 飼料 | 116000 | EII | 飼料 | 16200 |
4 | AIII | 国産燃料 | 99000 | FII | 肥やし | 15900 |
5 | DIII | 燃焼からの酸化窒素 | 75000 | II | 木材とパルプの化学製品(パルプと紙産業)の使用 | 6300 |
6 | EIII | 燃焼からの元素窒素 | 74000 | FIII | 燃料灰 | 6300 |
7 | YII | 肥やしと肥料と脱窒からの大気への排出 | 72000 | JIII | 産業および輸入飼料 | 6200 |
8 | BIII | 輸入燃料 | 68000 | AIII | 国産燃料 | 5700 |
9 | FII | 肥やし | 67000 | III | 産業使用のための動物製品 | 5700 |
10 | NII | 国内食物消費 | 33000 | NII | 国内食物消費 | 5500 |
フロー |
|
フロー |
|
|||
1 | DIII | 燃焼からの大気への酸化窒素 | 75000 | TI | 森林産業廃物の埋立物 | 3500 |
2 | YII | 肥やしと肥料と脱窒からの大気への排出 | 72000 | ADII | 農地からの浸出 | 2400 |
3 | ADII | 農地からの浸出 | 33000 | HIII |
燃料灰の埋立 〔一部(木材燃料)はTIフローと重複〕 |
2400 |
4 |
TIV、 VIV |
水への都市廃水放出 | 14000 | MIV | 都市下水汚泥の埋立物 | 900 |
5 | LIV | 都市固体廃物の埋立物 | 7000 | LIV | 都市固体廃物の埋立物 | 800 |