『Abstract
Phosphorus (P) in runoff can pose a water quality risk in phosphate
mine reclamation areas. High dissolved P (DP) concentrations (about
0.4-3.0 mg L-1) in runoff from these areas and high
equilibrium P concentrations for the soils led us to hypothesize
that P release is controlled by dissolution of apatite rather
than by desorption mechanisms. Objectives were to (a) verify via
chemical- and solid-state assessments that P in the reclamation
soils is mainly in the form of apatite and (b) examine evidence
that DP concentrations in runoff water from these soils is controlled
by apatite dissolution. Soil analyses included total P (TP), P
sorption isotherms, P fractionation, mineralogy, and P distribution
by particle size classes. Runoff samples were chemically characterized
and modeled for speciation. Results showed high TP concentrations
and the presence of apatite. The Ca- and Mg-bound P accounted
for about 95% of TP. Runoff samples were undersaturated with respect
to apatite. A strong relationship between calculated apatite specific
surface area and measured DP concentration in water extracts is
supportive of other evidence that apatite dissolution is a major
factor controlling P release from these soils. Data indicate that
these soils will be a long-term P source rather than sink. Results
are applicable to other phosphate mine reclamation sites and illustrate
the need to account for compositional differences between reconstructed
soils on reclaimed mining sites and their indigenous soil analogues.
Keywords: Dissolved phosphorus; Specific surface area; Apatite;
Dissolution; Reclamation area; Surface runoff』
1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Field sampling
2.2. Soil chemical properties
2.2.1. Mehlich-1 extraction
2.2.2. P sorption isotherms
2.2.3. P fractionation
2.2.4. TP in each particle fraction
2.2.5. Solid state assessments
2.3. Phosphate solubility equilibria
2.4. Approach for calculating CFA SSA
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Soil properties
3.2. Results of phosphate solubility equilibria
3.3. Relation between CFA SSA and DP concentration
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References