Fenton,O., Serrenho,A. and Healy,M.G.(2012): Evaluation of amendments to control phosphorus losses in runoff from dairy-soiled water. Water Air Soil Pollut., 222, 185-194.

『酪農場汚水からの排水中のリン酸塩ロスをコントロールする改善法の評価』


Abstract
 Amendments with the potential to reduce phosphorus (P) losses from agricultural grassland arising from the land application of dairy-soiled water (DSW) were investigated. Optimal application rates were studied, and associated costs and feasibility were estimated. First, batch tests were carried out to identify appropriate chemicals or phosphorus sorbing materials to control P in runoff from DSW. Then, the best four treatments were examined in an agitator test. In this test, soil - placed in a beaker - was loaded with DSW or amended DSW at a rate equivalent to 5 mm ha-1 ( the maximum permissible application rate of DSW allowable in a 42-day period in Ireland). The soil was overlain with continuously stirred water to simulate runoff on land-applied DSW. Optimum application rates were selected based on percentage removal of dissolved reactive phosphorus in over』lying water and the estimated cost of amendment. The costs of the amendments, per cubic metre of DSW, increased in the order: bottom ash (1.55 C(=が重なる:ユーロ、Euro sign)), alum (1.67 to 1.92 Euro), FeCl2・4H2O (3.55 to 8.15 Euro), and lime (20.31 to 88.65 Euro). The feasibility of the amendments, taking into account their cost, potential adverse effects, public perception, and their performance, decreased in the order: alum>FeCl2・4H2O>bottom ash>lime. Amendments to DSW could be introduced in critical source areas - areas where high soil test P and direct migration pathways to a receptor overlap.

Keywords: Dairy-soiled water; Iron (II) chloride tetrahydrite; Lime; Alum; Bottom ash

1. Introduction
 1.1. Amendments to sequester P
2. Materials and methods
 2.1. Soil preparation and analysis
 2.2. DSW sampling and analysis
 2.3. Classification and determination of suitable amendments for use in the agitator test
 2.4. Agitator test
 2.5. Water sampling and analysis
 2.6. Statistical analysis
 2.7. Cost analysis
3. Results
 3.1. DSW and amendment analysis
 3.2. Agitator test
 3.3. Statistical analysis
 3.4. Cost and feasibility analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References


戻る