Agrawal,S.G., King,K.W., Fischer,E.N. and Woner,D.N.(2011): PO43- removal by and permeability of industrial byproducts and minerals: Granulated blast furnace slag, cement kiln dust, coconut shell activated carbon, silica sand, and zeolite. Water Air Soil Pollut., 219, 91-101.

wŽY‹Ζ•›ŽY•¨‚ƍz•¨‚Ι‚ζ‚ιPO43-‚̏œ‹Ž‚Ζ“§…«F—±σ‚˜FƒXƒ‰ƒO‚ΖƒZƒƒ“ƒgƒLƒ‹ƒ“•²o‚ΖƒRƒRƒiƒbƒcŠkŠˆ«’Y‘f‚ΖƒVƒŠƒJ»‚Ζƒ[ƒIƒ‰ƒCƒgi•¦Ξjx


wAbstract
@Excess PO43- from agricultural subsurface drainage and runoff degrades the overall water quality of the receiving surface waters in a cumulatively damaging process known as eutrophication. In the past 25 years, PO43- removal by industrial byproducts and minerals has received considerable attention because these materials are both abundant and inexpensive. In this study, the saturated falling-head hydraulic conductivity and phosphate removal capability of granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS), cement kiln dust (CKD), zeolite, silica sand, and coconut shell activated carbon (CS-AC) were assessed. GBFS, zeolite, silica sand, CS-AC, and 5:95“ and 10:90“ CKD/sand blends all exhibited hydraulic conductivities†0.001 cm/s. GBFS and the CKD/sand blends exhibited„98“ PO43- removal while CS-AS removed 70-79“ of initial PO43- concentrations. In contrast, silica sand and zeolite removed 21-58“ of PO43-. The phosphate removal data for each material was modeled against the Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, Dubinin-Radushkevich, and Frumkin sorption isotherms to yield insight into possible removal mechanisms. Overall, GBFS, CKD, zeolite, silica sand, and CS-AC were sufficiently permeable and removed significant amounts of PO43- and should be considered for use in treatment of agricultural effluent.
Keywords: Phosphate; Sorption; Industrial byproducts; Activated carbon; Slag; Zeolitex

1. Introduction
2. Methods
@2.1. Industrial byproducts and minerals
@2.2. Saturated hydraulic conductivity
@2.3. PO43- sorption batch experiments
@2.4. Isotherm modeling
3. Results
@3.1. Hydraulic conductivity/permeability
@3.2. Batch-sorption experiments
@3.3. Isotherm model fits
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References


–ί‚ι