wAbstract
@Over the last two decades, climate change has become a major
environmental and public health concern due to the increase of
the mean temperature on the Earth and its consequences on extreme
meteorological events such as floods and droughts. These events
induce very low or very high river flows that may impair surface
water quality, and therefore results in potential health impacts
when used for drinking water production. The present study aims
at assessing the impact of hydrologic regime on surface water
quality with a particular emphasis on total organic carbon (TOC)
and nitrate. Water quality data from three French rivers acquired
over a 27 years period, from January 1983 to December 2009, show
the influence of extreme flows. Variation in TOC and nitrate concentrations
showed opposite patterns for the whole range of flow rate (from
less than 10“ up to more than 100“ of the mean flow). Regarding
fluxes, TOC increased continuously with flow rate while nitrate
was stable for very high discharges. The C/N ratio expressed from
TOC and nitrate concentrations showed high values for extreme
flows and particularly for very low flow rates, generally, in
summer, where nitrate is assimilated by biomass. Considering TOC
and nitrate fluxes, it is confirmed that the worst situations
were encountered for very high flow rates, namely for TOC exportation
during surface runoff which was related to heavy rains or floods.
These findings are of great importance with regard to the adaptation
for drinking water treatment in facing extreme hydrological conditions,
of which the frequency is increasing with climate change.
Keywords: Resource water quality; Data analysis; Weather events;
Climate changex
1. Introduction
2. Material and methods
@2.1. Description of the experimental field
@2.2. Raw data
@2.3. Data pre-treatment
3. Results and discussion
@3.1. Variation of organic carbon and nitrate with river flow
@3.2. Distribution of organic carbon and nitrate according to
river flow
@3.3. Variation of TOC and nitrate fluxes with flow rate
@3.4. Variation of organic carbon-nitrate relationship with river
flow
4. Discussion
@4.1. C/N variation
@4.2. Towards a generalization
@4.3. Impact on small scale water services
@4.4. Hydrological limits for monitoring relevance
5. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References