Huang,G., Fallowfield,H., Guan,H. and Liu,F.(2012): Remediation of nitrate-nitrogen contaminated groundwater by a heterotrophic-autotrophic denitrification approach in an aerobic environment. Water Air Soil Pollut., 223, 4029-4038.

wD‹CŠÂ‹«‚Å‚Ì“Æ—§‰h—{|]‘®‰h—{’E’‚ƒAƒvƒ[ƒ`‚É‚æ‚éÉŽ_‰–|’‚‘f‰˜õ’n‰º…‚̉ü‘Px


wAbstract
@A novel heterotrophic-autotrophic denitrification (HAD) approach supported by mixing granulated spongy iron, methanol, and mixed bacteria was proposed for the remediation of nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) contaminated groundwater in a dissolved oxygen (DO)-rich environment. The HAD process involves biological deoxygenation, chemical reduction (CR) of NO3-N and DO, heterotrophic denitrification (HD), and autotrophic denitrification (AD). Batch experiments were performed to: (1) investigate deoxygenation capacities of HAD; (2) determine the contributions of AD, HD, and CR to the overall NO3-N removal in the HAD; and (3) evaluate the effects of environmental parameters on the HAD. There were 174, 205, and 2,437 min needed to completely reduce DO by the HAD, spongy iron-based CR, and by the mixed bacteria, respectively. The HAD depended on abiotic and biotic effects to remove DO. CR played a dominant role in deoxygenation in the HAD. After 5 days, approximately 100, 63.0, 20.1, and 9.7 “ of the initial NO3-N was removed in the HAD, HD, AD+CR, and CR incubations, respectively. CR, HD, and AD all contributed to the overall NO3-N removal in the HAD. HD was the most important NO3-N degradation mechanism in the HAD. There existed symbiotic, synergistic, and promotive effects of CR, HD, and AD within the HAD. The decrease in NO3-N and the production of nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N) and ammonium-nitrogen (NH4-N) in the HAD were closely related to the C to N weight ratio. The C to N ratio of 3.75:1 was optimal for complete denitrification. Denitrification rate at 27.5Ž was 1.36 times higher than at 15.0Ž.

Keywords: Nitrate-nitrogen; Groundwater; Heterotrophic-autotrophic denitrification (HAD); Spongy iron; Methanolx

1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
@2.1. Chemicals and reagents
@2.2. Enrichment culture protocol to establish a denitrifying bacterial population
@2.3. Batch experiments
@2.4. Analytical measurements
3. Results and discussion
@3.1. Deoxygenation capacities of HAD, chemical reduction, and mixed bacteria
@3.2. Contributions of chemical reduction, heterotrophic denitrification, and autotrophic denitrification to the performance of HAD
@3.3. Effect of C to N ratio on HAD
@3.4. Effect of water temperature on HAD
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References


–ß‚é