Scharenbroch,B.C. and Bockheim,J.G.(2008): The effects of gap disturbance on nitrogen cycling and retention in late-successional northern hardwood-hemlock forests. Biogeochemistry, 87, 231-245.

w¬’·‚Μ’x‚’–k•ϋL—tŽχ|ƒwƒ€ƒƒbƒNi•Δ’́j—Ρ‚Ι‚¨‚―‚ι’‚‘fzŠΒ‚Ζ•ΫŽ‚Ι—^‚¦‚ιƒMƒƒƒbƒvi—ΡŠ₯‚ΜŒŠjŠh—‚Μ‰e‹Ώx


wAbstract
@Late-successional forests in the upper Great Lakes region are susceptible to nitrogen (N) saturation and subsequent nitrate (NO3-) leaching loss. Endemic wind disturbances (i.e., treefall gaps) alter tree uptake and soil N dynamics; and, gaps are particular susceptible to NO3- leaching loss. Inorganic N was measured throughout two snow-free periods in throughfall, forest floor leachates,and mineral soil leachates in gaps (300-2,000 m2, 6-9 years old), gap-edges, and closed forest plots in late-successional northern hardwood, hemlock, and northern hardwood -hemlock stands. Differences in forest water inorganic N among gaps, edges, and closed forest plots were consistent across these cover types: NO3- inputs in throughfall were significantly greater in undisturbed forest plots compared with gaps and edges; forest floor leachate NO3- was significantly greater in gaps compared to edges and closed forest plots; and soil leachate NO3- was significantly greater in gaps compared to the closed forest. Significant differences in forest water ammonium and pH were not detected. Compared to suspected N-saturated forests with high soil NO3- leaching, undisturbed forest plots in these late-successional forests are not losing NO3- (net annual gain of 2.8 kg ha-1) and are likely not N-saturated. Net annual NO3- losses were observed in gaps (1.3 kg ha-1) and gap-edges (0.2 kg ha-1), but we suspect these N leaching losses are a result of decreased plant uptake and increased soil N mineralization associated with disturbance, and not N-saturation.

Keywords: Forest gap; Forest floor leachate; Nitrate; Soil leachate; Throughfallx

Introduction
Materials and methods
@Site description
@Forest water fluxes
@Drainage flux estimates with WATBAL
@Statistical analyses
Results and discussion
@Justification for examining treatment effects across cover types
@Forest water and N flux treatment effects across cover type
@Nitrate retention capacity of gaps, edges, and forests
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References


ƒz[ƒ€‚Φ