wAbstract
@We investigated soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) distribution
and developed a model, using readily available geospatial data,
to predict that distribution across a mountainous, semi-arid,
watershed in southwestern Idaho (USA). Soil core samples were
collected and analyzed from 133 locations at 6 depths (n = 798),
revealing that aspect dramatically influences the distribution
of C and N, with north-facing slopes exhibiting up to 5 times
more C and N than adjacent south-facing aspects. These differences
are superimposed upon an elevation precipitation) gradient, with
soil C and N contents increasing by nearly a factor of 10 from
the bottom (1100 m elevation) to the top (1900 m elevation) of
the watershed. Among the variables evaluated, vegetation cover,
as represented by a Normalized Difference Vegetation Index(NDVI),
is the strongest, positively correlated, predictor of C; potential
insolation (incoming solar radiation) is a strong, negatively
correlated, secondary predictor. Approximately 62 (as R2)
of the variance in the C data is explained using NDVI and potential
insolation, compared with an R2 of 0.54 for a model
using NDVI alone. Soil N is similarly correlated to NDVI and insolation.
We hypothesized that the correlation between soil C and N and
slope, aspect and elevation reflect, in part, the inhibiting influence
of insolation on semi-arid ecosystem productivity via water limitation.
Based on these identified relationships, two modeling techniques
(multiple linear regression and cokriging) were applied to predict
the spatial distribution of soil V and N across the watershed.
Both methods produce similar distributions, successfully capturing
observed trends with aspect and elevation. This easily applied
approach may be applicable to other semi-arid systems at larger
scales.
Keywords: Soil carbon; Insolation; NDVI; Statistical model; Semi-aridx
1. Introduction
2. Material and methods
@2.1. Study sites and land use history
@2.2. Sample collection and laboratory analysis methods
@2.3. Predictor variables
@@2.3.1. Elevation and precipitation
@@2.3.2. Potential insolation
@@2.3.3. NDVI/vegetation
@2.4. Statistical analysis and modeling
3. Results
@3.1. General trends in spatial distribution of C and N
@3.2. Predictors of soil C and N
@3.3. Modeled spatial distribution of C and N
4. Discussion
@4.1. Underlying controls on soil carbon distribution
@4.2. Importance of disturbance
@4.3. Comparison and appropriateness of modeling approaches
@4.4. Future modeling efforts
@4.5. Implications for soil carbon management and climate change
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References