Odman(Oの頭に¨),F., Ruth,T., Rodushkin,I. and Ponter(eの頭に´),C.(2006): Validation of a field filtration technique for characterization of suspended particulate matter from freshwater. Part II. Minor, trace and ultra trace elements. Applied Geochemistry, 21, 2112-2134.

『淡水からの浮遊粒子状物質の特性づけのための野外ろ過技術の検証:その2.少量・微量・超微量元素』


Abstract
 A field filtration method for the concentration and separation of suspended particulate matter (SPM) from freshwater systems and the subsequent determination of minor, trace and ultra trace elements (As, Ba, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Ga, Hf, Mo, Nb, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sb, Sc, Sn, Sr, Ta, Th, Tl, U, V, W, Zn and Zr) is validated with respect to detection limits, precision and bias. The validation comprises the whole procedure including filtration, sample digestion and instrumental analysis. The method includes two digestion procedures (microwave acid digestion and alkali fusion) in combination with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and inductively coupled plasma quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QMS). Total concentrations of these 27 trace and minor elements have been determined in suspended particulate matter (SPM) from lake and river water with low levels of suspended solids (<2 mg L-1 DW), and a wide range of element concentrations. The precision of the method including filtration, digestion and instrumental determination ranges between 8% and 18%RSD for most elements on a dry weight basis. Higher recovery after acid digestion is found for some elements, probably because of volatilization or retention losses in the fusion procedure. Other elements show higher recovery after fusion, which is explained by more efficient decomposition of refractory mineral phases relative to the non-total acid digestion. Non-detectable concentrations of some elements are reported due to small differences between blank filter levels and the amounts of elements present on the filters after sampling. The method limits of detection ranges between 0.7 ng and 2.65μg, as estimated from the blank filter samples. These detection limits are 10-550 times higher compared to the corresponding instrumental limits of detection. The accuracy and bias of the overall analytical procedure was assessed from replicate analysis of certified reference materials. A critical evaluation of the instrumental capabilities of the ICP-QMS instrumentation in comparison with a double focusing sector field plasma mass spectrometry technique (ICP-SFMS) is also included. It was found that a modified microwave acid digestion procedure in combination with ICP-SFMS could replace ICP-AES determinations and fusion digestions for most of the investigated elements. Guidelines and limitations for this time- and labour- efficient procedure, offering accurate results for the majority of elements studied are discussed.』

1. Introduction
2. Sampling sites
3. Experimental
 3.1. Sample collection and handling procedures
 3.2. Instrumentation and analytical procedure
4. Results and discussion
 4.1. Reagent blanks and blank filter levels compared to instrumental LODs
 4.2. Sampling of SPM from natural water systems - amounts of elements collected
 4.3. Comparison of recovery of individual elements between microwave and fusion dissolutions
 4.4. Bias
 4.5. Uncertainty introduced in normalization of SPM data
 4.6. Analytical performance of ICP-SFMS in comparison with ICP-QMS and ICP-AES
 4.7. Analytical capabilities of a modified microwave digestion procedure
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References


戻る