『Abstract
　A number of chemical and physical processes inside and outside a sedimentary basin (e.g. evaporite dissolution and topographic drive, respectively) affect groundwater flow near the basin's margin. Contrasting formations at the margin, typically basinal sedimentary rocks and basement, are host to the interplay between these processes so that groundwater flows and compositions change within a relatively small volume. To interpret how groundwater flow and geochemistry have evolved, interactions between these processes must be understood. Such interactions were investigated near the margin of the East Irish Sea Basin in NW England, by sampling deep groundwaters (to 1500 m below sea level) from Ordovician volcanic basement rocks and Carboniferous to Triassic sedimentary cover rocks. Variable Br/Cl ratios and Cl concentrations in deep saline waters and brines indicate mixing patterns. Variations in ³⁶Cl/Cl constrain the timing of mixing. Relatively low Br/Cl ratios (ca. 1×10^-3 by mass) characterise brine from the western sedimentary cover and reflect halite dissolution further west. Saline water with relatively high Br/Cl ratios (ca. 2×10^-3 by mass) of uncertain origin occupies the eastern basement. These two waters mix across the area. However, mixing alone cannot explain variable ³⁶Cl/Cl ratios, which partly reflect differing in situ ³⁶Cl production rates in different rock formations. Most ³⁶Cl/Cl ratios in groundwater sampled from the eastern metavolcanic basement (mean = 25×10^-15) and western sedimentary cover (mean = 10×10^-15) are at or close to equilibrium with in situ ³⁶Cl production. These variations in ³⁶Cl/Cl across the site possibly took ＞1.5 Ma to be attained, implying that deep groundwater flow responded only slowly to the Quaternary glaciation of the site. Interplay between varied processes in basin marginal settings does not necessarily imply flow instability』

1. Introduction
2. Principles of applying ³⁶Cl data
3. Geological setting
4. Hydrogeological setting
5. Groundwater compositions
6. Methodology for ³⁶Cl study
　6.1. Sample selection
　6.2. Analytical methods
7. Results
　7.1. Contamination by LiCl tracer and drilling water
　7.2. Summary of water data
8. Discussion
　8.1. Process controlling variations in ³⁶Cl/Cl in the Sellafield groundwaters
　8.2. Equilibrium ³⁶Cl/Cl in the Sellafield groundwaters
　8.3. Timing of chloride movement
　8.4. Relationship of variability in ³⁶Cl/Cl and Br/Cl to conceptual models for flow
9. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References