『Abstract
　Sedimentological observations and palaeomagnetic data for Cryogenian glacial deposits present the climatic paradox of grounded glaciers and in situ cold climate near sea-level, glaciomarine deposition, and accompanying large (up to 40℃) seasonal changes of temperature, all in low to near-equatorial (＜10゜) palaeolatitudes (equated with geographic latitudes). Neither the “snowball Earth” nor the “slushball Earth” hypothesis can account for such strong seasonality near the palaeoequator, which together with findings from sedimentology, chemostratigraphy, biogeochemistry, micropalaeontology, geochronology and climate modelling argue against those scenarios. An alternative explanation of glaciation and strong seasonality in low palaelatitudes is offered by a high (＞54゜) obliquity of the ecliptic, which would render the equator cooler than the poles, on average, and amplify global seasonality. A high obliquity per se would not have been a primary trigger for glaciation, but would have strongly influenced the latitudinal distribution of glaciers. The principle of low-latitude glaciation on a terrestrial planet with high obliquity is validated by theoretical studies and observations of Mars. A high obliquity for the early Earth is a likely outcome of a single giant impact at 4.5 Ga, the widely favoured mechanism for lunar origin. This implies that a high obliquity could have prevailed during most of the Precambrian, controlling the low palaeolatitude of glaciations in the early and late Palaeoproterozoic and Cryogenian. It is postulated that the obliquity changed to ＜54゜ between the termination of the last Cryogenian low-palaeolatitude glaciation at ≦635 Ma and the initiation of Late Ordovician-Early Silurian circum-polar glaciation at 445 Ma.
　The High Obliquity, Low-latitude Ice, STrong seasonality (HOLIST) hypothesis for pre-Ediacaran glaciation emerges favourably from numerous glacial and non-glacial tests. The hypothesis is in accord with such established or implied features of Cryogenian glaciogenic successions as extensive and long-lived open seas, an active hydrological cycle, aridity and palaeowesterly (reversed zonal) winds in low palaeolatitudes, and the apparent diachronism or non-correlation of some low-palaeolatitude glaciations. A pre-Ediacaran high obliquity also offers a viable solution of the faint young Sun paradox of a warm Archaean Earth. Furthermore, reduction of obliquity during the Ediacaran-early Palaeozoic would have yielded a more habitable globe with much reduced seasonal stresses and may have been an important factor influencing the unique evolutionary events of the Ediacaran and Cambrian. The palaeolatitudinal distribution of evaporites cannot discriminate unambiguously between high- and low-obliquity states for the pre-Ediacaran Earth. Intervals of true polar wander such as postulated by others for the Ediacaran and Early Cambrian imply major mass-redistributions within the Earth at those times, which may provide a potential mechanism for reducing the obliquity during the Ediacaran-early Palaeozoic.

Keywords: Proterozoic; Ediacaran; glaciation; palaeoclimate; palaeomagnetism; obliquity of the ecliptic』

1. Introduction
　1.1. Global glaciation?
　1.2. A pre-Ediacaran high obliquity?
2. The Proterozoic (pre-Ediacaran ) glacial environment
　2.1. Late Cryogenian glacial settings in South Australia
　2.2. In situ cold climate near sea-level and strong seasonality
　2.3. Low palaeolatitude of pre-Ediacaran glaciations
　　2.3.1. Cryogenian glaciations
　　2.3.2. Plaeoproterozoic glaciations
　　2.3.3. Reality of low-latitude glaciation
3. The HOLIST hypothesis
　3.1. The Proterozoic climatic paradox
　3.2. High-obliquity Earth
4. High obliquity and low-latitude glaciation of Mars
5. Correcting misunderstandings about the HOLIST hypothesis
　5.1. Not just a model for ice distribution
　5.2. Ediacaran glaciation excluded
　5.3. High obliquity not a trigger for glaciation
　5.4. Synchronism of glaciations not required
　5.5. Climate cycles and glaciation-carbonate association permitted
6. Testing the HOLIST hypothesis
　6.1. Glacial tests
　　6.1.1. Periglacial and glacial aridity in low palaeolatitudes
　　6.1.2. Palaeowind direction in low palaeolatitudes
　　6.1.3. Long-lived and extensive open seas
　　6.1.4. Diachronous or non-correlative Cryogenian glaciations
　6.2. Non-glacial tests
　　6.2.1. Viable solution of the faint young Sun paradox
　　6.2.2. Cryogenian palaeotidal regime
　　6.2.3. No heliotropism of Proterozoic stromatolites
　　6.2.4. Evolutionary events of the Ediacaran-Cambrian
7. Evaporite palaeolatitudes and obliquity
8. Obliquity acquisition and change
　8.1. Early acquisition of a high obliquity
　8.2. Subsequent reduction of obliquity
9. Discussion
　9.1. The Proterozoic climatic dilemma
　9.2. Future directions and tests
10. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References