Dai,H., Masui,T., Matsuoka,Y. and Fujimori,S.(2011): Assessment of China's climate commitment and non-fossil energy plan towards 2020 using hybrid AIM/CGE model. Energy Policy, 39, 2875-2887.

『ハイブリッドAIM/CGEモデルを用いた2020年に向けての中国の気候約束と非化石エネルギー計画の評価』


Abstract
 China made a commitment in Copenhagen to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP from 40% to 45% compared with the 2005 level by 2020, and is determined to vigorously develop non-fossil fuels. This study analyzes the effects and impacts of policies that could help to achieve China's Copenhagen commitments with a hybrid static CGE model in which the electricity sector is disaggregated into 12 generation technologies. Four scenarios are developed, including the reference scenario A, the reference scenario B and two carbon constraint scenarios. The results show that carbon intensity in terms of GDP will fall by 30.97% between 2005 and 2020 in the reference scenario A, and will be reduced further by 7.97% if China's targeted non-fossil energy development plans can be achieved in the reference scenario B. However, the rest of the 40-45% target must be realized by other measures such as carbon constraint. it is also observed that due to carbon intensity constraints, GDP loss would be from 0.032% to 0.24% compared to the reference scenario B, and CO2 emission reductions are due mainly to decreases in coal consumption in the electricity sector and manufacturing sector.

Keywords: China's commitment; Non-fossil energy; Computable general equilibrium models』

1. Introduction
2. Methodology
 2.1. Production
 2.2. Household
 2.3. Government
 2.4. International transaction
 2.5. CO2 abatement
3. Base year data
 3.1. Input-output data in 2005
 3.2. Energy balance table in 2005
 3.3. CO2 emissions factors
 34. Data for characteristics of electricity generation technologies
4. Scenario
5. Results
 5.1. Carbon intensity and carbon price in 2020
 5.2. Primary energy consumption and electricity generation
 5.3. GDP
 5.4. Energy cost, activity level and sectoral contribution to CO2 reduction
 5.5. Sensitivity analysis
6. Discussion
 6.1. CO2 emissions and macroeconomic impacts
 6.2. Comparison with IPAC-AIM/Enduse model
 6.3. Comparison with historical trends
7. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Appendix A
References


戻る