『Abstract
　In this paper we argue that the political incentives that resource endowments generate are the key to understanding whether or not they are a curse. We show: (1) politicians tend to over-extract natural resources relative to the efficient extraction path because they discount the future too much, and (2) resource booms improve the efficiency of the extraction path. However, (3) resource booms, by raising the value of being in power and by providing politicians with more resources which they can use to influence the outcome of elections, increase resource misallocation in the rest of the economy. (4) The overall impact of resource booms on the economy depends critically on institutions since these determine the extent to which political incentives map into policy outcomes. Countries with institutions that promote accountability and state competence will tend to benefit from resource booms since these institutions ameliorate the perverse political incentives that such booms create. Countries without such institutions however may suffer from a resource curse.

Keywords: Natural resources; Political economy; Clientelism』

1. Introduction
2. The model
　2.1. Credible policies
　2.2. Equilibrium policy
3. Extension: dictatorship
4. The nature of the resource curse
　4.1. Resource booms improve the efficiency of the extraction path
　4.2. Resource booms lead to politically motivated expansions of the public sector
　4.3. Institutional foundations of the resource curse
5. Concluding remarks
References