(Introduction)
Is there a resource curse?
Economic explanations for a resource curse
Political explanations for the resource curse
Cognitive explanations
Societal explanations
State-centered explanations
Other directions: Parastatals and property rights
wConclusion
@Much of the variance between resource and nonresource exporters
can almost certainly be tied to international economic factors,
including a decline in the terms of trade for primary commodities
and the instability of commodity markets. We still know little,
however, about the politics of the resource curse - why resource-exporting
governments respond perversely or ineffectively to these and other
hardships. Over the past two decades, the gap has widened between
our understanding of the economics and our understanding of the
politics of resource exporters.
@The disparity between strong cumulative findings on economic
questions and weak noncumulative findings on political questions
is partly due to failure of political scientists to test their
own hypotheses. The dearth of hypothesis testing in political
science may reflect the high costs of doing primary research in
the developing world; it may also reflect the peculiar incentives
of the subfield of comparative development, which tends to reward
the production of gnewh theories but to disdain the testing of
existing ones. Whatever its source, the absence of hypothesis
testing has hindered the contributions of political science to
the study of the resource curse. More subtly, it has enabled political
scientists to produce theories that are unworkably vague. In recent
years, the field of comparative politics has shown greater concern
for methodological rigor. This review underscores the importance
of this new trend.
@Twenty-seven of the thirty-six states in the World Bank's most
troubled category - severely indebted low-income countries - are
primary commodity exporters. For these and scores of other states,
insights into the sources of the resource curse could have far-reaching
consequences. Further progress will depend, in part, on the ability
of political scientists to test their hypotheses with greater
methodological care; on their willingness to place their theories
in testable form, even when they cannot be tested; and on the
proclivity of both economists and political scientists to pay
closer attention to each others' contributions.x