『Abstract
Mineral assemblages in common sulfide ore deposits are examined
together with phase relations to (I) investigate the pressure-temperature
conditions required for the onset of metamorphically induced partial
melting involving economic minerals, and (2) place constraints
on the amount of melt produced. Deposits that contain sulfosalt
or telluride minerals may start to melt at conditions ranging
from lowest greenschist facies to amphibolite facies. Deposits
lacking sulfosalt and/or telluride minerals may begin to melt
once P-T conditions reach the upper amphibolite facies, if galena
is present, or well into the granulite facies if galena is absent.
The result is two broad melting domains: a low- to medium-temperature,
low melt volume domain involving melting of volumetrically minor
sulfosalt and/or telluride minerals; and a high-temperature, potentially
higher melt volume domain involving partial melting of the major
sulfide minerals. Epithermal gold deposits, which are especially
rich in sulfosalt minerals, are predicted to commence melting
at the lowest temperatures of all sulfide deposit types. Massive
Pb-Zn (-Cu) deposits may start to melt in the lower to middle
amphibolite facies if pyrite and arsenopyrite coexist at these
conditions, and in the upper amphibolite facies if they do not.
Excepting sulfosalt-bearing occurrences, massive Ni-Cu-PGE (platinum
group element) deposits will show little to no melting under common
crustal metamorphic conditions, whereas disseminated Cu deposits
are typically incapable of generating melt until the granulite
facies is reached, when partial melting commences in bornite-bearing
rocks. The volume of polymetallic melt that can be generated in
most deposit types is therefore largely a function of the abundance
of sulfosalt minerals. Even at granulite-facies conditions, this
volume is usually less than 0.5%. The exception is massive Pb-Zn
deposits, where melt volumes significantly exceeding 0.5 vol.%
may be segregated into sulfide magma dykes, allowing mobilization
over large distances.
Keywords: sulfide melt; ore deposits; melt migration; metamorphism』
Introduction
Overview of conditions required for sulfide melting
The temperature of sulfide melting
Factors affecting the temperature of sulfide melting
Pressure
Sulfur and oxygen fugacity
Water and other hydrothermal phases
Comparison with silicate metamorphism
Mineral communication and mobilization-assisted melting
Ealiest melting in sulfide ore deposits
Massive Pb-Zn±Cu deposits
Observations
An experimental test of sulfide melting at the Montauban deposit
Mineralogical constraints on initial melting
Volume of melt generated during initial melting
Mobilization-assisted melting in massive Pb-Zn±Cu deposits
Evidence for preferential metal accumulation in melts
Gold deposits - the influence of sulfosalts
Observation
Mineralogical constraints on initial melting
Volume of melt generated
Initial metamorphic melting in magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE deposits
Highly metamorphosed deposits
Constraints on initial melting
Disseminated Cu deposits (porphyry/IOCG/redbed/skarn)
Examples of amphibolite- and granulite-hosted Cu deposits
Constraints on melting
Mobilization of polymetallic melt at low melt fractions
Discussion and conclusions
Acknowledgements
References
Fig. 3. The temperature-pressure range over which sulfosalts, tellurides, native minerals and sulfides melt. Continuous black lines indicate that pressure constraints are known; dashed black lines indicate that the effect of pressure is unknown. Wide grey lines separate the metamorphic facies [the amphibolite to granulite transition is from Pattison et al. (2003) and the other facies boundaries are from Spear (1993)]. The wide band separating minor from major melting represents the variation caused by differences in the natural environment in the amount of H2O present (Wykes & Mavrogenes, 2005), and in the amount of trace metals present, on an assemblage containing galena+chalcopyrite+pyrrhotite+sphalerite. There will be widespread melting of the major sulfides at lower temperatures in wet, trace metal-rich rocks. The melting curve of galena+troilite (stoichiometric FeS)+sphalerite plots in the same position as that for bornite+ISS and bornite+pyrrhotite (Fe1-xS). 〔Tomkins,A.G., Pattison,D.R.M. and Frost,B.R.(2007): On the initiation of metamorphic sulfide anatexis. Journal of Petrology, 48(3), 511-535.から〕 |