カナダ地質調査所(Geological Survey of Canada)による『Mineral
Deposits of Canada Maps of deposits and resources(world)』から
Volcanic Associated Massive Sulphides (VMS) 〔火山性塊状硫化(鉱)物(鉱床)〕
Volcanogenic-associated massive sulfide deposits
(VMS)
by Alan Galley, Mark Hannington and Ian Jonasson
Contents of this page:
Abstract
Definition
Geographical Distribution
Grade and Tonnage
Geological Attributes
Genetic/Exploration Models
Knowledge Gaps
Some Areas of High Mineral Potential in Canada
Acknowledgements
References
Tables
Figures
Appendices
Abstract
Volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits, also known as volcanic-associated,
volcanic-hosted, and volcanosedimentary- hosted massive sulphide
deposits, are major sources of Zn, Cu, Pb, Ag, and Au, and significant
sources for Co, Sn, Se, Mn, Cd, In, Bi, Te, Ga, and Ge. They typically
occur as lenses of polymetallic massive sulphide that form at
or near the seafloor in submarine volcanic environments, and are
classified according to base metal content, gold content, or host-rock
lithology. There are close to 350 known VMS deposits in Canada
and over 800 known worldwide. Historically, they account for 27%
of Canada’s Cu production, 49% of its Zn, 20% of its Pb, 40% of
its Ag, and 3% of its Au. They are discovered in submarine volcanic
terranes that range in age from 3.4 Ga to actively forming deposits
in modern seafloor environments. The most common feature among
all types of VMS deposits is that they are formed in extensional
tectonic settings, including both oceanic seafloor spreading and
arc environments. Most ancient VMS deposits that are still preserved
in the geological record formed mainly in oceanic and continental
nascent-arc, riftedarc, and back-arc settings. Primitive bimodal
mafic volcanic-dominated oceanic rifted arc and bimodal felsic-dominated
siliciclastic continental back-arc terranes contain some of the
world’s most economically important VMS districts. Most, but not
all, significant VMS mining districts are defined by deposit clusters
formed within rifts or calderas. Their clustering is further attributed
to a common heat source that triggers large-scale subseafloor
fluid convection systems. These subvolcanic intrusions may also
supply metals to the VMS hydrothermal systems through magmatic
devolatilization. As a result of large-scale fluid flow, VMS mining
districts are commonly characterized by extensive semi-conformable
zones of hydrothermal alteration that intensifies into zones of
discordant alteration in the immediate footwall and hanging wall
of individual deposits. VMS camps can be further characterized
by the presence of thin, but areally extensive, units of ferruginous
chemical sediment formed from exhalation of fluids and distribution
of hydrothermal particulates.
Figure 1:
Schematic diagram of the modern TAG sulphide deposit on the Mid-Atlantic
Ridge. This represents a classic cross-section of a VMS deposit,
with concordant semi-massive to massive sulphide lens underlain
by a discordant stockwork vein system and associated alteration
halo, or "pipe". From Hannington et al. (1998).
Figure 4:
Graphic representation of the lithological classification for
VMS deposits by Barrie and Hannington (1999), with the addition
of a "high sulphidation" type to the bimodal felsic
group. Average and median sizes for each type for all Canadian
deposits, along with average grade, are shown.
Figure 11:
There are three principal tectonic environments in which VMS
deposits form, each representing a stage in the formation of
the Earth's crust. (A) Early Earth evolution was dominated by
mantle plume activity, during which numerous incipient rift events
formed basins characterized by early ocean crust in the form
of primitive basalts and/or komatiites, followed by siliciclastic
infill and associated Fe-formation and mafic-ultramafic sills.
In the Phanerozoic, similar types of incipient rifts formed during
transpressional, back-arc rifting (Windy Craggy). (B) The formation
of ocean basins was associated with the development of ocean
spreading centers along which mafic-dominated VMS deposits formed.
The development of subduction zones resulted in oceanic arc formation
with associated extensional domains in which bimodal mafic, bimodal
felsic, and mafic-dominated VMS deposits formed. (C) The formation
of mature arc and ocean-continent subduction fronts resulted
in successor arc and continental volcanic arc assemblages that
host most of the felsic-dominated and bimodal siliciclastic deposits.
Thin black arrows represent direction of extension and thick,
pale arrows represent mantle movement.
Figure 14:
The development and maturation of a generic subseafloor hydrothermal
system involves three stages. (A) The relatively deep emplacement
of a subvolcanic intrusion below a rift/caldera and the establishment
of a shallow circulating, low-temperature seawater convection
system. This results in shallow subseafloor alteration and associated
formation of hydrothermal exhalative sediments. (B) Higher level
intrusion of subvolcanic magmas and resultant generation of a
deep-seated subseafloor seawater convection system in which net
gains and losses of elements are dictated by subhorizontal isotherms.
(C) Development of a mature, large-scale hydrothermal system
in which subhorizontal isotherms control the formation of semiconformable
hydrothermal alteration assemblages. The high-temperature reaction
zone next to the cooling intrusion is periodically breached due
to seismic activity or dyke emplacement, allowing focused upflow
of metal-rich fluids to the seafloor and formation of VMS deposits.
From Galley (1993).
カナダ地質調査所(Geological Survey of Canada)による『Mineral
Deposits of Canada Maps of deposits and resources(world)』から |
ホームへ