Voegelin,A.R., Nagleria‚Μ“ͺ‚ɁNj,T.F., Pettke,T., Neubert,N., Steinmann,M., Pourret,O. and Villa,I.M.(2012): The impact of igneous bedrock weathering on the Mo isotopic composition of stream waters: Natural samples and laboratory experiments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 86, 150-165.

w—¬…‚Μƒ‚ƒŠƒuƒfƒ““―ˆΚ‘Μ‘g¬‚Ι‘Ξ‚·‚ι‰Ξ¬ŠβŠξ”ΥŠβ•—‰»‚Μ‰e‹ΏF“V‘RŽŽ—Ώ‚ΖŽΐŒ±ŽΊŽΐŒ±x


wAbstract
@River waters have been shown to be systematically enriched in the heavy molybdenum (Mo) isotopes when compared to typical granites and basalts, which generally possess Mo isotopic compositions (ƒΒ98/95Mo) of around 0ρ. This inconsistency has been used to argue against weathering of crustal rocks as the cause for heavy riverine ƒΒ98/95Mo signatures. Incongruent dissolution of primary bedrock, however, may be an important process by which the anomalous Mo signatures of the river dissolved load are produced. This study therefore investigates the effect of igneous crustal rock weathering on the aquatic ƒΒ98/95Mo signal by comparing stream water and bedrock Mo isotope data to results of bulk rock leach experiments. For this purpose, stream water and bedrock (orthogneiss, granite, basalt), as well as soil and vegetation samples were collected in a small catchment in the French Massif Central. In accordance with the results of earlier studies on riverine Mo, both streams are isotopically heavier (ƒΒ98/95Mo = 0.5-1.1ρ) than the typical granites and basalts. The excellent agreement of these data with those of Mo released during experimental leaching of the basalt bedrock (0.6-1.0ρ) identifies a predominance of basalt weathering over the stream water Mo geochemistry, while other processes (i.e. soil formation, secondary mineral precipitation and adsorption) are subordinate in this catchment. Given that the basalt bulk rock ƒΒ98/95Mo reflects a value typical for crustal magmatic rocks (ca. 0.1ρ), Mo isotope fractionation during the incongruent dissolution of basalt can explain the observed isotopically heavy aquatic Mo signatures. Laser ablation analyses demonstrate that the volumetrically minor magmatic sulfides can be highly enriched in Mo and mass balance calculations identify the sulfide melt inclusions as the principal Mo source for the leach solutions. These data suggest that the magmatic sulfides posses a distinctly heavier ƒΒ98/95Mo signature than the coexisting silicate melt. In this case, Mo would behave like Fe by showing a detectable isotope fractionation at magmatic temperatures. Incongruent crustal bedrock weathering may thus cause a preferential release of heavy Mo isotopes. This effect, however, is highly dependent on the primary bedrock mineralogy. Consequently, the average continental runoff may have been significantly affected by incongruent weathering during periods when the Earth system was exceptionally far from steady state, e.g., large glaciations with enhanced physical weathering or large subaerial basalt eruptions such as the Deccan and the Siberian plateau.x

1. Introduction
2. Study site and sampling
@2.1. Geological setting
@2.2. Sampling
@2.3. Rock sample descriptions
3. Analytical methods
@3.1. Leach experiments
@3.2. Preparation of water, rock, soil and vegetation samples
@3.3. Chemical purification and isotope analysis of Mo and Sr
@3.4. Major anion and cation analyses of stream waters and leach solutions
@3.5. Laser ablation ICP-MS analyses of bedrock minerals
4. Results
@4.1. Natural samples
@@4.1.1. Stream water and bedrock geochemistry
@4.2. Single grain and matrix element concentrations determined by LA-ICP-MS
@4.3. Soil, vegetation and suspended load
@4.4. Laboratory leach experiments
@@4.4.1. Basalt leach solutions and residues
@@4.4.2. Orthogneiss and granite leach solutions
5. Discussion
@5.1. Natural samples: bedrock and stream waters
@5.2. Experimental primary mineral dissolution
@@5.2.1. Incongruent bedrock weathering
@@5.2.2. Mo released from basalts: host phases and mass balance
@@5.2.3. The role of Mo adsorption to Fe-Ti oxide surfaces during experimental dissolution
@5.3. Implications for the natural environment
@5.4. Consequences for the global Mo isotope budget
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References


–ί‚ι