Safadoust,A., Mahbouobi,A.A., Gharabaghi,B., Mosaddeghi,M.R., Voroney,P., Unc,A. and Sayyad,G.(2011): Bacterial filtration rates in repacked and weathered soil columns. Geoderma, 167-168, 204-213.

『再充填された風化土壌カラムにおけるバクテリア濾過速度』


Abstract
 Knowledge of the transport and deposition behavior for pathogenic Escherichia coli is needed to assess contamination and protect water resources. We evaluated the effects of repacked (R) and physically and biologically weathered (PBW) columns of sandy loam and clay loam soils on the transport and retention of E. coli and bromide under saturated and unsaturated flow conditions. PBW soil columns were weathered outdoors by exposure to wetting, drying, freezing and thawing cycles during the winter of 2008 and spring and summer of 2009. These physically weathered soil columns were subjected to additional 6 months of biological weathering by 20 earthworms placed onto each soil columns. Nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli (E. coli NAR) and bromide (Br) were employed as pulse tracers and their temporal and spatial variabilities were monitored in the leachate samples. The flow regimes (inlet suction 0 for saturated and 5 hPa for unsaturated) were controlled using a tension infiltrometer. Cumulative percentage and maximum concentrations (Cmax) of Br and E. coli NAR and filtration coefficients (λf) of E. coli NAR were assessed. In the repacked soil columns, average bacterial concentration and Cmax in leachate were lower, likely due to enhanced pollutant/soil particle interactions at low water fluxes. The largest λf occurred in the repacked clay loam soil. Accelerated water velocities through preferential flow pathways were likely responsible for the smaller filtration coefficients in the PBW columns. Unsaturated flow conditions resulted in larger λf values for E. coli NAR and smaller Cmax values for both tracers.

Keywords: Repacked soil; Weathered soil; Filtration coefficient; Preferential flow; Tension infiltrometer』

1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
 2.1. Soil preparation and treatments
 2.2. Tracers and leaching setup
 2.3. Filtration and transport parameters
 2.4. Statistical analysis
3. Results and discussion
 3.1. Cumulative percentage of recovered E. coli NAR and Br
 3.2. Maximum concentration (Cmax) of E. coli NAR and Br
 3.3. Filtration coefficient
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References


戻る