『Abstract
　Recognizing weathering effects is significant for any work carried out on glauconites at the surface. The mineralogy and chemistry of glauconite grains exposed to weathering in a hot arid climate for a maximum of 42 y were studied here. The objective of the study was to find the mineralogical and chemical differences between weathered glauconite from the surface and fresh glauconite from the subsurface.
　One specific glauconite-bearing layer at the surface (Layer 16) of the Abu Tartur phosphate mine, located in the Western Desert of Egypt, was studied in detail and compared to a fresh, subsurface glauconitic sandstone from the underground mine.
　Even within this single surface layer, the brownish-green glauconite grains vary in color and chemical composition. From top to bottom, the grains show an increase in Fe and K and a decrease in Al and S. In addition, the grains show an internal color zonation caused by variation of Fe and K contents between the center and rim of the grains. The differences in color and chemical composition are even more pronounced between the weathered-glauconite grains from the surface and the fresh glauconite grains from the subsurface which are dark green and enriched in Fe and K.
　The clay fractions consisted of mixed-layer glauconite (illite)-smectite, with the surface samples containing more expandable smectite (50%) than the subsurface samples (20%). In the charge-distribution diagram for muscovite-pyrophyllite-celadonite, the weathered glauconite at the surface showed a clear trend from smectitic glauconite at the top to illitic glauconite at the bottom of the layer, whereas the fresh subsurface sample plotted exactly in the glauconite field.
　The color, mineralogy, and chemistry indicate that the surface samples were strongly altered by weathering processes and that glauconite transformed progressively into Fe-rich mixed-layer illite-smectite and then into smectites. Weathering can thus completely reverse the glauconitization process. For any chemical and mineralogical characterization of glauconites at the surface, these weathering effects must be taken into consideration.

Key Words: Abu Tartur Mine; Egypt; Glauconite; Smectite; Weathering.』

Introduction
Geological setting
Materials and methods
　Thin-section microscopy
　X-ray diffraction
　Clay-mineral analyses
　X-ray fluorescence (XRF)
　Electron microprobe (EMP)
　Scanning electron microscope (SEM)
Results
　Mineralogy and petrology of the glauconitic sandstones
　Mineralogy of clay fraction
　Chemical composition of the bulk samples
　Chemical composition and structural formulae of glauconite grains
Discussion
　Chemical and mineralogical variations of glauconite grains within surface Layer 16
　Comparison of surface and subsurface glauconite grains
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References