『Abstract
　The micas are a unique class of minerals because of their layered structure. A frequent question arising in mica dissolution studies is whether this layered structure radically changes the dissolution mechanism. We address this question here, using data from VSI and AFM experiments involving muscovite to evaluate crystallographic controls on mica dissolution. These data provide insight into the dissolution process, and reveal important links to patterns of dissolution observed in framework minerals. Under our experimental conditions (pH 9.4, 155℃), the minimal global rate of normal surface retreat observed in VSI data was 1.42×10^-10 mol/m²/s (σ= 27%) while the local rate observed at deep each pits reached 416×10^-10 mol/m²/s (σ= 49%). Complementary AFM data clearly show crystallographic control of mica dissolution, both in terms of step advance and the geometric influence of interlayer rotation (stacking periodicity). These observations indicate that basal/edge surface area ratios are highly variable and change continuously over the course of reaction, thus obviating their utility as characteristic parameters defining mica reactivity. Instead, these observations of overall dissolution rate and the influence of screw dislocations illustrate the link between atomic step movement and overall dissolution rate defined by surface retreat normal to the mica surface. Considered in light of similar observations available elsewhere in the literature, these relationships provide support for application of the stepwave model to mica dissolution kinetics. This approach provides a basic mechanistic link between the dissolution kinetics of phyllosilicates, framework silicates, and related minerals, and suggests a resolution to the general problem of mica reactivity. 』

1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
　3.1. VSI data of etch pit populations
　3.2. VSI data: dissolution rates
　3.3. AFM data
4. Discussion
　4.1. Etch pit morphology, structure, and distribution
　4.2. Distribution of dissolution rates and their control by the phyllosilicate structure
　4.3. Application of the stepwave model
5. Summary
Acknowledgments
References