Halder,S. and Walther,J.V.(2011): Far from equilibrium enstatite dissolution rates in alkaline solutions at earth surface conditions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 75, 7486-7493.

w’n•\ðŒ‚ł̃Aƒ‹ƒJƒŠ«—n‰t’†‚Ì•œt‚©‚牓‚¢Šæ‰Î‹PÎ—n‰ð‘¬“xx


wAbstract
@Far from equilibrium enstatite dissolution rates both open to atmospheric CO2 and CO2 purged were measured as a function of solution pH from 8 to 13 in batch reactors at room temperature. Congruent dissolution was observed after an initial period of inconguent dissolution with preferential Si release from the enstatite. Steady-state dissolution rates in open to atmospheric CO2 conditions decrease with increase in solution pH from 8 to 12 similar to the behavior reported by other investigators. Judging from the pH 13 dissolution rate, rates increase with pH above pH 12. This is thought to occur because of the increase in overall negative surface changes on enstatite as Mg surface sites become negative above pH 12.4, the pH of zero surface charge of MgO.
@Steady-state dissolution rates of enstatite increase above pH 10 when CO2 was purged by performing the experiments in a N2 atmosphere. This suggests inhibition of dissolution rates above pH 10 when experiments were open to the atmosphere. The dissolved carbonate in these solutions becomes dominantly CO32- above pH 10.33. It is argued that CO32- forms a „Mg2-CO3 complex at positively charged Mg surface sites on enstatite, resulting in stabilization of the surface Si-O bonds. Therefore, removal of solution carbonate results in an increase in dissolution rates of enstatite above pH 10. The log rate of CO2-purged enstatite dissolution in moles per cm2 per s as a function of increasing pH above pH 10 is equal to 0.35. This is consistent with the model of silicate mineral dissolution in the absence of surface carbonation in alkaline solutions proposed earlier in the literature.x

1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
3. Experimental results
4. Discussion
@4.1. Relative rate of element release
@4.2. Effect of dissolved CO2
5. Concluding remarks
Acknowledgments
References


–ß‚é